baiboe Archivist
Number of posts : 433 Registration date : 2005-11-12
| Subject: [Traitorousness] Dark_Devil vs Barnstaple-Discharged(6/4/06) Thu 6 Apr - 17:13 | |
| - Bill of indictment wrote:
- conspiration, preparation of a revolt
- First defence pleading wrote:
- What ?? What's going on ??
I'm just tired to be prosecuted every week...
Do you have any proof ? Any witness ??
If it concerns the post in the Wiltshire's Inn, it's not a conspiration, as I just asked to the Council the authorization to do it. Where's the conspiration in this case ?? - Prosecutor indictment wrote:
- The defendant didn't present to the Court.
- Last defence pleading wrote:
- Could you please end this ridiculous trial ??
- Urshak (called by the prosecutor) wrote:
- Dear Judge,
I only come to confirm that what Sir Hakekr told you. Former mayor, Slexuis is a member of Dragon Vert, a French criminal organisation, they work in groups of 5 very active and motivated people. So that's also why Slexuis was voted mayor. Anyway, the rebellion would have been needed if I did not asked Lévan to shorten the period of the elections. Dark_devil has done nothing wrong.
Greetings, UrShak
- Harekr (called by the prosecutor) wrote:
- The council has been attempting to organize a rebellion against the absent former bandit mayor, Slexuis. Dark_Devil's discussion were in that vein, and do not constitute rebellion against proper authority. By vote of the council, there is no proper authority in Barnstaple at this time. Therefore, this charge is baseless. I recommend this charge be dismissed.
- Sentence wrote:
- Statement of accusation
The defendant has been discharged. May the defendant rise!
I find the defendant: Not guilty
I can't find a case here, so therfore the charge is dissmissed.
Cse closed!
Case judged by Björkel | |
|